Prompt library
Replace every bracketed field. Use only approved source material. These are starting structures, not guarantees of an accurate result.
Using only [approved document], propose an outline for [audience] that helps them [purpose]. Include [required sections]. Flag missing facts instead of filling gaps. End with five claims a reviewer should verify.
Review the result against the named source.Revise [selected text] for [audience] at a plain-language level. Preserve all defined terms and factual qualifiers. List any sentence whose meaning may have changed for human review.
Review the result against the named source.Draft a concise follow-up to [audience] about [topic]. Include [action], [owner], and [date]. Do not add commitments. Mark any fact not present in this thread as NEEDS REVIEW.
Review the result against the named source.Summarize this thread as decisions, open questions, owners, and deadlines. Separate confirmed information from proposals. Cite the message date for each decision.
Review the result against the named source.Using [approved agenda and documents], prepare five questions for this meeting. Group them under decision, risk, missing evidence, owner, and next step.
Review the result against the named source.Draft a recap of this meeting with decisions to verify, action owners, dates, unresolved issues, and sensitive items that should not be distributed broadly.
Review the result against the named source.Using only [approved report], propose a six-slide narrative for [audience and decision]. For every number, identify its source section. Do not invent outcomes or images.
Review the result against the named source.Review this presentation for reading order, contrast, dense text, unclear charts, missing alt text, jargon, and information available only visually. Return a prioritized correction list.
Review the result against the named source.Using this table, describe missing values, duplicate rows, inconsistent categories, date-range issues, and possible outliers. Do not change the data. Return the exact rows a data owner should inspect.
Review the result against the named source.Calculate [metric] for [period] using [definition and exclusions]. Show the formula or grouping logic, identify missing inputs, and provide three sample rows for verification.
Review the result against the named source.Compare [draft policy] with [approved requirements]. Return covered items, gaps, conflicts, ambiguous language, and questions for the policy owner. Do not provide legal conclusions.
Review the result against the named source.Act as a skeptical reviewer. Check this draft against [source] for unsupported claims, wrong numbers, missing qualifiers, private information, inaccessible language, and commitments that need approval.
Review the result against the named source.